Lawrence Tribe, in the most-recent Harvard Law Review, criticizes the "Bloggerati," writing:
My point isn't that judges who play the role Judge Taylor did should never be held to account for the shoddy quality of their legal analysis; of course they should, especially in the context of sober second thoughts offered in law reviews and other scholarly venues.
You can read the rest of his criticism here.
UPDATE: Oops! My apologies: Tribe offered his criticism of bloggers over at Jack Balkin's blog. I guess Tribe, rather than waiting the 6-9 months it takes law reviews to publish finalized papers, wanted to get his ideas out into the world while they were still timely and relevant. Who woulda thunk it?
