Gamso - For the Defense
Pottawattamie County v. McGhee: Fabricating Evidence is All in a Day's Work

Judge Jed S. Rakoff Stands Firm: No Conspiracies in his Courtroom

Last week Bank of America and the SEC conspired to trick Judge Jed S. Rakoff into approving a bogus settlement agreement.  Today Judge Rakoff sent a message to the SEC: Stop lying to me; stop cheating the American public; stop cheating Bank of America shareholders.  The Wall Street Journal is reporting:

Federal District Judge Jed S. Rakoff rejected a proposed $33 million settlement of allegations by the Securities and Exchange Commission that Bank of America Corp. "materially lied" in shareholder communications about bonuses to employees of Merrill Lynch & Co.

Instead, Judge Rakoff set a Feb. 1 trial date on the allegations in his New York courtroom.

In an order issued Monday, Judge Rakoff acknowledged the public interest in settling disputes rather than having them go to trial. Nonetheless, he wrote, "even upon applying the most deferential standard of review," he was "forced to conclude that the proposed consent judgment is neither fair, nor reasonable, nor adequate" to protect the public interest.

"It does not comport with the most elementary notions of justice and morality, in that it proposes that the shareholders who were the victims of the bank's alleged misconduct now pay the penalty for that misconduct," the judge wrote.

It's refreshing that Article III judges are now exercising their constitutionally-mandated powers.  Rather than rubber-stamping Executive Branch decisions, the Judicial Branch is exercising independent judgment - which is what the Constitution requires.  

Let's hope that the federal judge in U.S. v. Aleynikov (next hearing is Sept. 16, 2009) stands up to corrupt federal prosecutors, and orders dismissal of the criminal charges.  Perhaps the judge in Aleynikov will ask federal prosecutors whether the Department of Justice is investigating Goldman Sachs; and if not, why not?

Comments