Crime & Federalism

What does some beta male at the "pro male" site, The Spearhead, have in common with the feminist twits at Jezebel? They both dislike my comments about the guy who sucker punched a man, and filmed it.

• Jezebel
• The Spearhead

At least the chick at Jezebel uses her real name. The anonymous guy at the Spearhead, thinks I'm a "liberal," and refers to my "supersonic stupidity." When I do cardio later today, I'll amuse myself with comments.

I'll write something longer and nastier about The Spearhead guy later, maybe, but here's a summary: If you're a dude who takes care of his body, is good in bed, is cool, and is interesting, then women don't cheat on you. No one will tell you this, because it's mean. If you get cheated on, it's your fault. You've failed as a man.

Thus, anti-cheating mores are to me useless. I have no fear of a man "stealing" my woman from me, and thus don't need to rely on the charity of other men. PLEASE DON'T TAKE MY GIRL! Going around talking about hitting men for sleeping with your girl evidences weakness. It means you're afraid and insecure. You think you're a lion, threatening violence, when you're really a field mouse scampering through the woods, chirping anonymous mouse-thoughts.

I don't need morality, because what can some whiny male-bitch at The Spearhead do to me? He can't hurt my feelings, can't kick my ass in a fight, can't win an argument with me, and can't steal my women. Thus, I don't need to create moral rules. Morality exists for the weak, who collectivize to protect themselves from the strong.

Wouldn't it be better to become strong? "In the beginning, the noble caste was always the barbarian caste: their predominance did not lie mainly in physical strength but in strength of the soul—they were the whole human beings (which also means, at every level, 'more whole beasts.'" - Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil.

Instead of trying to put chains on other guys by creating moral rules, hit the gym, read a book, learn how to be a better lover, give a massage, get really good at eating pussy, and pay more attention to your women.

In short, live by my philosophy - which is based on self-improvement and love instead of jealousy and hate. If you're better than me, I'm not going to stew in jealously juices or write anonymous disatribes on a blog. I'm going to befriend you.

Everyone of my friends is, in some way, my superior - just as I am in some way superior to all of my friends. Excellence is not achived through passivity, but instead is obtained through fellowship with superior men. 

Stop being whiny haters, Spearhead guys. Or give it up now, and merge with Jezebel.

It's not about leaks being bad. It's about who gets to leak the information.

Whoever had the information has the sole power to leak it. Whoever has the power to leak the information has the sole power to create the narrative. He who tells the story has the power to control your mind.

Thus, Wikileaks is not about information: It's about narration. Who gets to tell you the story, and thus take control of your mind?

Ken at Popehat elaborates. 

Although this video is highly amusing, underneath it lies the cultural programming of all men. Like I, Robot, men are programmed to obey, to placate, to supplicate:

The Three Laws of Manhood, often shortened to The Three Laws or Three Laws, are a set of three rules written by feminists and white knights, and later expanded upon. The Laws are:

1. A man may not injure a woman or, through inaction, allow a woman to come to harm.

2. A man must obey any orders given to it by women, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.

3. A man must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

In the first scene, the guy wants to play golf. What's the problem?

Simple: His girl wanted him to do something else - for her. Thus, he broke the law of I, Beta Male. He should stay home and watch a stupid movie instead of hanging out with friends. He should do what she wants him to do instead of doing what he wants to do. Why? See Rule 2.

Imagine, however, if the guy weren't a slave. On his way out of the the house, he notices his girl in sexy underwear, with a few lit candles - maybe even some porn and tequila. Would he ever want to leave? Such a scenario is incomprehensible to those living the life of I, Beta Male.

Thus, here is a video translating womanspeak for the slave robots.

Out of respect for his family and friends, "gossipy" posts about Jason Wheelington have been removed. Deatils on the memorial service are available here. RIP.

Out of respect for his family and friends, "gossipy" posts about Jason Wheelington have been removed. Deatils on the memorial service are available here. RIP.

If you aren’t a fan of the band Supercell, then perhaps you recall Jason Wheelington’s name from another of his endeavors. Awhile back, Wheelington caught his wife cheating on him. At the time, he had stage four cancer. But that didn’t stop him from bum-rushing the other guy and trying to deck him — then putting up video of the incident on Facebook (which video has since been taken down).

A friend of Wheelington’s tells us that he lost his battle with cancer on Saturday. Our thoughts are with his family and friends.

Out of respect for his family and friends, "gossipy" posts about Jason Wheelington have been removed. Deatils on the memorial service are available here. RIP.

Out of respect for his family and friends, "gossipy" posts about Jason Wheelington have been removed. Deatils on the memorial service are available here. RIP.

In the latest corporate- and government-sponsoered attack on Wikileaks, the Economist and other sources argue that Wikileaks is making diplomats less effective. People no claim that "diplomacy will no longer be possible." 

So what if "diplomacy would no longer be possible"? Is the U.S. suddenly going to collapse? Why should I care if "diplomacy" is no longer possible?

What have our diplomatic relations accomplished? The Saudis are still funding terrorist groups. China is hacking into Google. Pakistan is hiding terrorists. And yet we invaded Iraq.

Yes, although the Saudis are the ones funding Bin Laden, we invaded Iraq. How is this logical? Why haven't we invaded Saudi Arabia? Why haven't our "diplomatic relations" with Saudi Arabia led to the arrest of the Saudis who are funding Bin Laden?

It seems our diplomacy has been an epic fail. Why continue with our failed diplomatic relations policy? Let's just bring the incompetent diplomats home.

The U.S. could shut down every embassy office in the world, and the only people who would be impacted would be favor-traders who raise money in order to become diplomats.

You do realize, don't you, that one does not become a diplomat through any objective qualification? Instead, you raise a lot of money/do a lot of favors for the political elite. Then you become Ambassador.

If Embassy offices were staffed with the most qualified instead of cronies, maybe there'd be a point to the Economist article. Yet that's not how the system works.

Thus, the article's entire logic fails due to a faulty premise. Because "diplomacy" - at least how it's done by the U.S. Department of State - is such an failure, then Wikileaks does not harm U.S. interests.

By the way, if the Wikileaks stuff is so dangerous to good citizens everywhere, and is a danger to national security...Where are the bodies? Shouldn't people have been killed by now?

Or is the attack on Wikileaks more Big Government fear mongering?

How dare people accuse the media of sharing notes and delivering the same message in the name of their lord and and masters: 

In U.S. elite media, the main revelation of the WikiLeaks diplomatic cables is that the U.S. government conducts its foreign policy in a largely admirable fashion.

Look at the numerous examples. It's almost as if media members e-mail each other to ensure everyone remains on point? Oh, wait....

JournoList (sometimes referred to as the J-List)[1] was a private Google Groups forum for discussing politics and the news media with 400 "left-leaning"[2] journalists, academics and others. Ezra Klein created the online forum in February 2007 while blogging at The American Prospect and shut it down in June 2010. 

The reason conservatives and libertarians are retarded for calling it the liberal media is because there is nothing liberal about a plutocracy. The media serves as apologists for their large corporate owners and for a large, centralized government.

By the way, remember that missile that was fired off the coast of California? What ever happened to that story? What "hard-hitting," "take-no-prisoners" "independent journalist" is investigating? That story just went away, didn't it?

Why? An Air Force general persuasively argued that someone shot a missle off the coast of California. The Pentagon offered no explanation, other than to say it was not a missile. The media moved along, even though the story would ahve been great for ratings.

Who asked the media to stop asking questions? Why did the media listen?

More importantly: Why are you listening to the media?

Tyrants in Madison County, Wisconsin don't have anything better to do than oppress a 72-year-old man:

ALEXANDRIA, Ind. (WISH) - 72-year-old Dick Thompson’s fight may soon be over — his land is up for sale.

“It brings tears to my eyes, and I don't shed tears very easy,” Thompson says of the mountain of support he’s received.

In recent days that includes a letter from Colorado with a check for $10 with “Land of the Free” in the memo line.

Thompson faced eviction from his 38 acres in Madison County. The county lawyer told 24-Hour News 8 it's because Thompson is breaking too many rules, laws and ordinances; Thompson has no water, no sewer and no electricity in his recreational trailer that he calls home. Bottom line: You can’t permanently live in a recreational vehicle. Now that the land is up for sale, it’s clear his trailer won’t be his permanent home.